FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU

Post new topic   Reply to topic

Page 7 of 7 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU

Post  BGS on Fri Feb 06, 2009 2:56 pm

Three cheers for Cursez and the smooth organisation of this defensive operation!

alien cheers flower

BGS

Male Number of posts: 696
Age: 31
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Humor: Intact
Registration date: 2008-12-18

View user profile http://nothing-new-under-the-sun.blogspot.com

Back to top Go down

Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU

Post  V-La on Fri Feb 06, 2009 4:10 pm


_________________
Don't find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain." Henry Ford

V-La
Leadership
Leadership

Female Number of posts: 378
Age: 31
Location: Chicago, IL
Humor: I have one!!
Registration date: 2008-04-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU

Post  Guest on Fri Feb 06, 2009 4:55 pm

This is getting old. Everytime I look at the attacks page, there are attacks from people we have NAP's with. This needs to stop. It seems as the NAP is being used to farm us and so we won't attack them because we actually honor pacts we make.

MNU-N

Subject: Waazzzap. attacks Dupont Circle
sent: on 02/06/09 at 11:16:31 am

Attacker mxny from the village Waazzzap.
[Clubswinger] [Spearman] [Axeman] [Scout] [Paladin] [Teutonic Knight] [Ram] [Catapult] [Chief] [Settler] [Hero]
Troops 576 0 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Casualties 116 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bounty 2722 3949 1944 327

Defender Smoosh from the village Dupont Circle
[Legionnaire] [Praetorian] [Imperian] [Equites Legati] [Equites Imperatoris] [Equites Caesaris] [Battering Ram] [Fire Catapult] [Senator] [Settler] [Hero]
Troops 65 60 50 2 15 0 0 0 0 0 1
Casualties 52 48 40 2 12 0 0 0 0 0 0


MNU=HD=

Subject: 01 WEHRMACHT attacks Alextopia
sent: on 02/06/09 at 07:56:22 am

Attacker HorthyEde from the village 01 WEHRMACHT
[Clubswinger] [Spearman] [Axeman] [Scout] [Paladin] [Teutonic Knight] [Ram] [Catapult] [Chief] [Settler]
Troops 0 0 196 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Casualties 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bounty 673 608 626 834

Defender Alextopia from the village Alextopia
[Clubswinger] [Spearman] [Axeman] [Scout] [Paladin] [Teutonic Knight] [Ram] [Catapult] [Chief] [Settler]
Troops 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Casualties 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU

Post  V-La on Fri Feb 06, 2009 5:25 pm

I agree with you incubus...I still think we get a big defensive drive going, break all naps and kick some MNU ass! Let them know who FUN is or we play the same game they are and play stupid when approached being asked why the hell did we attack them when we have a NAP. Enough is Enough!!!

_________________
Don't find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain." Henry Ford

V-La
Leadership
Leadership

Female Number of posts: 378
Age: 31
Location: Chicago, IL
Humor: I have one!!
Registration date: 2008-04-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU

Post  Guest on Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:04 pm

I was getting ready to send to someone that attacked a LITE member this morning, but thought better of it until I figured out what was going on. I agree with incubus, this is getting old.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU

Post  VersusAllOdds on Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:34 pm

I hope this post gives you the picture whether we should trust NwM leaders or not (click on the pic when you link to it, just so you could see the size of letters in that post from the NwM forums, and hense, the importance they give to us):


_________________
http://funf-ville.myminicity.com/
RAINBOW MONKEYS

VersusAllOdds
Leadership
Leadership

Male Number of posts: 574
Location: Beograd, Cp6uja
Registration date: 2008-03-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU

Post  Guest on Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:44 pm

They obviously knew what they are doing. Also, I don't 100% agree with the MM saying "the long and short of it is that it's very difficult for us to argue the case of our NAP when we are all being very profitable for the raiders." The only reason they can do this is because there is that security knowing we have a NAP with them. Therefore, they should not have attacked us in the first place to find that they can get lots of resources.

If everyone got their marketplace up and constantly shipped them off with resources from main village to their SH, village, this shouldn't be a problem. As long as the cats don't hit the city and resources are kept to a min in the main village, then they would just look like idiots.

In response to VAO's last post, I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt right now, but if it continues, I will not just sit here and take it, as I'm sure a lot of our alliance is feeling. Together, we could be great allies if they decide to finally honor their pacts.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU

Post  Guest on Sat Feb 07, 2009 4:11 am

And the shit continues.

MNU=HOT=

Subject: Beehive #1 scouts catastrophe
sent: on 02/06/09 at 09:30:58 pm

Attacker BeeSting from the village Beehive #1
[Clubswinger] [Spearman] [Axeman] [Scout] [Paladin] [Teutonic Knight] [Ram] [Catapult] [Chief] [Settler]
Troops 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
Casualties 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0
Resources 2658 2693 2328 1697

Defender nematode from the village catastrophe
[Legionnaire] [Praetorian] [Imperian] [Equites Legati] [Equites Imperatoris] [Equites Caesaris] [Battering Ram] [Fire Catapult] [Senator] [Settler] [Hero]
Troops X X X X X X X X X X X


Last edited by Incubuss421 on Sat Feb 07, 2009 4:12 am; edited 1 time in total

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU

Post  jackajay on Sat Feb 07, 2009 4:11 am

Friends,igmed minus and another one to stop the attacks here is the igm.

Minus 06.02.09
RE: Hi 12:00:17
Hi
Sorry it's new and i didn't have already look the news today^^
____________
Arc wrote:

Hi friend,

Both our alliance have an NAP,then why are u attacking our member.Pls stop future attacks

Regards,
JJ



HorthyEde 06.02.09
RE: Hi 13:23:01
Ok
____________
Arc wrote:

Hi friend,

Both our alliance have an NAP,then why are u attacking our member.Pls stop future attacks

Regards,
JJ

jackajay
Assistant Post
Assistant Post

Number of posts: 197
Registration date: 2008-03-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU

Post  Guest on Sat Feb 07, 2009 4:19 am

You know what would be really interesting? I'd like to see what happens when a couple of our members start farming them and sending scouts. My guess is they flip and make a huge deal about it instantly.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU

Post  superyee on Sat Feb 07, 2009 7:56 am

More than likely that will happen....
Their ally is a mess the leaders are having a hard time arranging confeds and NAPs.
Might as well ready up some defense cause things might get ugly.

_________________
El poder de un heroe esta en su corazón no en sus puños.

Song: No Importa La Distancia (I Know Some Of You Will Get It)

superyee

Male Number of posts: 349
Age: 19
Location: California
Humor: You Bet!
Registration date: 2008-05-05

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU

Post  VersusAllOdds on Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:29 am

Most likely, I will lock this topic. Present any suggestions/questions to your leaders, or make a new one, this is way off topic.

_________________
http://funf-ville.myminicity.com/
RAINBOW MONKEYS

VersusAllOdds
Leadership
Leadership

Male Number of posts: 574
Location: Beograd, Cp6uja
Registration date: 2008-03-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU

Post  DZ|Cursez on Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:16 pm

VAO don't lock threads all of a sudden.

We had another ,and i think the last, hit on radmila subajic.

http://travilog.org.ua/en/4819629/bb7380d06ad044d8924490a833991633

DZ|CZ

_________________
A man doubts as long as he lives...If he's clever

DZ|Cursez

Male Number of posts: 415
Age: 20
Humor: Yes please
Registration date: 2008-03-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU

Post  BGS on Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:20 pm

DZ|Cursez wrote:VAO don't lock threads all of a sudden.

We had another ,and i think the last, hit on radmila subajic.

http://travilog.org.ua/en/4819629/bb7380d06ad044d8924490a833991633

DZ|CZ

Nice - would have been even better before most of the troops were sent home. Oh well...

Crop, people, crop! If you send reinforcements, you need to keep sending crop regularly. If you sent 150 crop worth of defence, that's 750 crop every 5 hours (or 500 every 3h 20m or 1000 every 6h 40m, depending on your merchant).

BGS

Male Number of posts: 696
Age: 31
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Humor: Intact
Registration date: 2008-12-18

View user profile http://nothing-new-under-the-sun.blogspot.com

Back to top Go down

whats up with you guys???

Post  sarah-here on Thu Feb 12, 2009 12:45 pm

Hi there,
I am sarah-here and I was the diplomat with MNU at the time you guys were talking naps/confeds.
I was talking to VAO last night on Skype and was very upset when he told me he was seriously thinking about quitting the game. So I went on and on and on at him to tell me why. When he finally did tell me the reason, I once again push him into letting me read some of your posts. He made me a temporary member of your forums. This took a lot of trust on his part, but believe me his trust is well placed, my feelings about the FUN alliance are known already to a few of you.
I think you do not appreciate the work that VAO and Cursez but into getting you all naps with both MNU and NwM.
No other leader from FUN, or FUN LITE bothered to contact me in anyway, which I found very odd indeed. In fact if not for the efforts of VAO there would have been no naps for any FUN wing apart from FUN*F. It was purely down to his work that MNU napped with you other guys.
No one from FUN which I assumed to be the main wing, made any attempt to talk, Superyee did at least attempt to make contact for LITE but very much after the event.
So in my opinion you should all be very glad to have someone like VAO on your team, making an effort for the whole of your alliance, as he seems to be the only person able to communicate with other alliances on your behalf. He alone has made me respect and admire the FUN name, and I really believe that if you sort yourselves out a little bit, you could be the strongest smaller alliance on this server. You remind me of the MNU I loved on the last S6.
So instead of arguing amongst yourselves, get your team ready for taking a WW, with VAO’s help I think you could do it. If you do I pledge my tiny little alliances help in making you winners.

With respect
Sarah-here
now leader of
The Dinosaurs

sarah-here

Number of posts: 1
Registration date: 2009-02-12

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 7 of 7 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


Post new topic   Reply to topic
Permissions of this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum