FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU
Page 6 of 7 • Share •
Page 6 of 7 •
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 
Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU
How come they havent gotten one with the main wing? i have been gettin attacked, out of nowhere from a few members from MNU=HD=. i would appreciate one and im sure others would too. lol

flyerz108-
Number of posts: 168
Location: Philadelphia----United States
Humor: Loyalty is 1%
Registration date: 2008-03-04
Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU
For what I was told by Sarah(wrank's ex dual) the fact that a wing isn't listed doesn't mean it doesn't have the NAP,
They just wanted to save space and make it less messy.
But apparently their members don't know that and/or don't care.
They just wanted to save space and make it less messy.
But apparently their members don't know that and/or don't care.
_________________
El poder de un heroe esta en su corazón no en sus puños.
Song: No Importa La Distancia (I Know Some Of You Will Get It)

superyee-
Number of posts: 349
Age: 19
Location: California
Humor: You Bet!
Registration date: 2008-05-05
Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU
MNU=HD= has offered a NAP to FUN. 04.02.09 13:01
Can any of u leader position pls accept it.
Can any of u leader position pls accept it.

jackajay- Assistant Post

- Number of posts: 197
Registration date: 2008-03-02
Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU
the_killjill wrote:MNU=HD= and SU-MNU have napped with us
Excellent.
I assume you need a FUN (not not FUN*F) leader to accept the proposed NAP in JJ's message?

BGS-
Number of posts: 696
Age: 31
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Humor: Intact
Registration date: 2008-12-18

Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU
Yup...and it has been accepted. 

VioletV- Leadership

-
Number of posts: 455
Location: New Jersey (or just over the border from it), USA
Registration date: 2008-03-02
Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU
I need ALL of wing leaders to offer NAPs to ALL NwM wings.
Issue resolved.
Issue resolved.

VersusAllOdds- Leadership

-
Number of posts: 574
Location: Beograd, Cp6uja
Registration date: 2008-03-02
Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU
Done on my end. For the record, I got a reply from NwM-CZ in response to my question about why the NAP was dropped stating that their members were attacking ours so the NAP was disadvantageous to them.

VioletV- Leadership

-
Number of posts: 455
Location: New Jersey (or just over the border from it), USA
Registration date: 2008-03-02
Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU
Anybody mind explaining why is MNU attacking LITE???
I just got attacked.
http://travilog.org.ua/en/6049306/c6d5fe619c1d0db445b886b07f1a819d
I just got attacked.
http://travilog.org.ua/en/6049306/c6d5fe619c1d0db445b886b07f1a819d
_________________
El poder de un heroe esta en su corazón no en sus puños.
Song: No Importa La Distancia (I Know Some Of You Will Get It)

superyee-
Number of posts: 349
Age: 19
Location: California
Humor: You Bet!
Registration date: 2008-05-05
Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU
That is H wing of MNU who don't have NAP with any of FUN wings.
DZ|CZ
DZ|CZ
_________________
A man doubts as long as he lives...If he's clever

DZ|Cursez-
Number of posts: 415
Age: 20
Humor: Yes please
Registration date: 2008-03-03
Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU
hmmmm if that's the case ill talk to people....
_________________
El poder de un heroe esta en su corazón no en sus puños.
Song: No Importa La Distancia (I Know Some Of You Will Get It)

superyee-
Number of posts: 349
Age: 19
Location: California
Humor: You Bet!
Registration date: 2008-05-05
Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU
VersusAllOdds wrote:I need ALL of wing leaders to offer NAPs to ALL NwM wings.
Issue resolved.
Sent to all NwM wings.
_________________
Don't find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain." Henry Ford

V-La- Leadership

-
Number of posts: 378
Age: 31
Location: Chicago, IL
Humor: I have one!!
Registration date: 2008-04-30
Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU
VioletV wrote:Done on my end. For the record, I got a reply from NwM-CZ in response to my question about why the NAP was dropped stating that their members were attacking ours so the NAP was disadvantageous to them.
If that is the case then we have to organise a coordinated def to show them that we are too strong enough and make them think twice before attacking us.

jackajay- Assistant Post

- Number of posts: 197
Registration date: 2008-03-02
Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU
I know this may sound as a futile attempt to excuse my not-too-good diplomatic performance lately, but you should all know that NwM and MNU are breaking their mutual NAPs, and sometimes attack each other. I hope this is not the way it is, and I talked to the new NwM leader, she told me what she will do to ensure that NwM people don't break NAPs, and I felt convinced.
I think it is unnecessary to post the attacks, better post when things get back into normal. Until then, I agree with JJ that we should assemble a few good defenses and prove our worth.
I suggest to all the members to focus their energy on defending efficiently, now.
Your leaders are working on this issue the best way they could, trust me.
I think it is unnecessary to post the attacks, better post when things get back into normal. Until then, I agree with JJ that we should assemble a few good defenses and prove our worth.
I suggest to all the members to focus their energy on defending efficiently, now.
Your leaders are working on this issue the best way they could, trust me.

VersusAllOdds- Leadership

-
Number of posts: 574
Location: Beograd, Cp6uja
Registration date: 2008-03-02
Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU
VersusAllOdds wrote:I know this may sound as a futile attempt to excuse my not-too-good diplomatic performance lately, but you should all know that NwM and MNU are breaking their mutual NAPs, and sometimes attack each other. I hope this is not the way it is, and I talked to the new NwM leader, she told me what she will do to ensure that NwM people don't break NAPs, and I felt convinced.
I think it is unnecessary to post the attacks, better post when things get back into normal. Until then, I agree with JJ that we should assemble a few good defenses and prove our worth.
I suggest to all the members to focus their energy on defending efficiently, now.
Your leaders are working on this issue the best way they could, trust me.
U r right VAO,I can see the situation many members of NWM and MNU are not seeing to their NAP/ALLY list before attacking.I talked with some of them who attacked us,they said sry for the attacks and told they didnt see to the updated NAP list.So the best thing we can do at the moment is save ourself by building Def and also cooordinating with people near by to us from our alliance to get quick reinfs.

jackajay- Assistant Post

- Number of posts: 197
Registration date: 2008-03-02
Re: FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU
Speaking of which , we defended radmila subajic today and killed -
40 Teutonic Knights
4 Legionnaires
49 Imperians
5 scouts
50 Clubs
45 Axes
1 Hero.
I think there will be 1 or 2 more attacks more. by the way the attackers were NwM and MNU. We lost 38 units.
DZ|CZ
40 Teutonic Knights
4 Legionnaires
49 Imperians
5 scouts
50 Clubs
45 Axes
1 Hero.
I think there will be 1 or 2 more attacks more. by the way the attackers were NwM and MNU. We lost 38 units.
DZ|CZ
_________________
A man doubts as long as he lives...If he's clever

DZ|Cursez-
Number of posts: 415
Age: 20
Humor: Yes please
Registration date: 2008-03-03
Page 6 of 7 •
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 
Permissions of this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum



