FUN's stance in a possible alliance with NWM, and NAP with MNU

Kaitlyn wrote:General conscensus from IGMs that I (we) have received is that we (the wing of FUN) go NAP with NWM/MNU. If they approached us, why wasn't FUN offered the same courtesy FUN*F was in setting up diplomatic talks?

As the FUN wing members reply to me, it would seem that our members are open to NAP. Shall I approach NWM/MNU using FUN*F as a reference, or shall I wait for NWM/MNU to think about approaching us (wing of FUN)?

Are there any members who outwardly oppose a NAP with them?

In favor of the NAP instead of the Confed while the war is on.

While I understand the reasons it may be preferable to keep our head down while establishing the SH, the reality is that the confed (at least with FUN*F) has already gone through and been noticed (at least by some). At this stage, to try to switch back to a NAP (at least for FUN*F) would probably not reduce any backlash we might experience and would probably damage trust with NwM. I say that at least for FUN*F, we ought to stick with the confed and think it is quite an achievement to be here.

Don't be afraid, BGS!
I'm surprised every day at =H='s impotence.
Flank is a fucking war machine... Aiming for 1:1 troop:pop in a few days, when members cool off from the last military build up campaign

I'm not afraid, I'm a complete noob at this game. I was just basing my comments on a couple of guides I read that suggested trying to avoid major wars during the first half of the server.

Also, 1:1 troop count isn't that high a proportional thing. Some alliances ask for 2:1 minimum and go anywhere up to 5:1, even 10:1.

10:1 ...............................................................

1:1 is a major thing at this period of game for us. with 1:1 deff troops we could deflect the entire =H= and beyond.

DZ|CZ

Simmy. If we get 1:1, we will be as powerful as ANY alliance on the server. I tell you that having in consideration our population and other alliances populations...

10:1 really?
I've seen individuals claiming 4:1, but no alliances asking more than 3:1.
Simmy, can you link to any alliances that ask for 10:1?
Not that I don't believe you... :-)

I meant some players in alliances have 10:1

Sergeant Simmy wrote:I meant some players in alliances have 10:1

well they may have 10:1 but I bet you they would find it very difficult recovering if they lost their troops. That's why we're only asking for 1:1 because that means you should be able to rebuild quickly if any unfortunate accidents occur, develop your village and still have a large army.

From what I have Gathered, MNU and H has merged into a confederation. I believe our NAP still stands with MNU or those who once were MNU, however, Those that were once H, now with the banner of MNU continue to attack us, or more specifically, Lite. MNU has no confederation or NAP with Lite whatsoever.

What I propose is that we talk MNU into having all it's wings NAP with all our wings. That, however, may be impossible, since we signed ourselves up as people on the side of NwM, and currently MNU is on H's side as they merged. Given this, MNU will most likely cut the ropes.

If this is true, then the numerous forewarning of a possible back stab from our allies was true after all.

I really want to know how in a world could you find out that "we have sided with NwM", lol!

We have sided with them in the anti-=H= war and I don't know where do you see "MNU" there... We have a NAP with them.

Also, you should know how much time me and Cursez spend on diplomatic relations, and relax.

VAO what simmy said is true, MNU has merged with =H= and some of its members has attacked LITE.
Which is worries me cause we are talking of our little fries!

At the point where Liters are at the moment, they need nothing more than crannies, and everyone will stop attacking them as soon as they become non-profitable.

In my opinion, if they can't make themselves unlootable, they don't deserve this alliance.

VersusAllOdds wrote:At the point where Liters are at the moment, they need nothing more than crannies, and everyone will stop attacking them as soon as they become non-profitable.

In my opinion, if they can't make themselves unlootable, they don't deserve this alliance.

i havent seen a attack on lite members for ages, but that might be cos the page is filled with my raids cos im a micro raider...